Akosgojack

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly big language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as many smaller sized firms have actually established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses throughout a large range of industries, consisting of software application development, healthcare, financing, home entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item design. [19] However, concerns have been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the usage of phony news or deepfakes to trick or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and imitate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of creating artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have formerly been checked out by myth, fiction and approach because antiquity. [23] The idea of automated art go back a minimum of to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where inventors such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having developed devices capable of writing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of creative automations has thrived throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been used to model natural languages given that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and analyzed the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The academic discipline of expert system was developed at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced several waves of development and optimism in the decades given that. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have used expert system to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and exhibiting generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, especially computer-aided procedure planning, utilized to generate sequences of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state area search and constraint fulfillment and were a “relatively mature” innovation by the early 1990s. They were used to produce crisis action strategies for military use, [35] procedure prepare for manufacturing [33] and choice plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of maker knowing used both discriminative models and generative models, to design and forecast information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep learning drove development and research study in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this age were usually trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of learning generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative models were the very first to output not just class labels for images however likewise entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] leading to the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the ability to generalize not being watched to various jobs as a Structure design. [40]

The brand-new generative designs presented throughout this period allowed for big neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision learning or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the supervised learning common of discriminative designs. Unsupervised knowing removed the requirement for human beings to by hand identify data, enabling bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a complimentary web application that might produce convincing character voices using minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent developments in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to high-quality artificial intelligence art development from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unmatched capabilities in producing photorealistic images, art work, and develops based upon text descriptions, causing widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the general public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT revolutionized the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s ability to participate in natural conversations, create innovative content, help with coding, and perform various analytical tasks recorded worldwide attention and stimulated extensive discussion about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could fairly be seen as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating numerous modalities including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and motion, paving the method for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI design readily available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed plans for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 family of large language designs, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated significant improvements in abilities throughout different standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably surpassing leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated improved efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, especially in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become an international leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants using the technology, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s copyright developments in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using without supervision machine knowing (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine learning trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the modality or kind of the information set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language designs). They are capable of natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language models can be trained on shows language text, enabling them to generate source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices using as low as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website gained widespread attention for its capability to generate mentally expressive speech for different imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music in addition to text annotations, in order to produce brand-new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a soothing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been created, like the tune Savages, which used AI to mimic rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists need to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been produced that can be created using a text expression, category choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to generate brand-new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research uses prompts like “get blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out basic reasoning in reaction to user prompts and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when provided the prompt choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be established utilizing linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been incorporated into a variety of existing commercially available items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise readily available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a couple of billion specifications can run on smart devices, embedded devices, and individual computer systems. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion specifications) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with tens of billions of criteria can operate on laptop or desktop computers. To achieve an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be set up to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area include defense of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific concentrates on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That online forum is one of just 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, usually run on datacenter computers geared up with ranges of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large models are normally accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is complimentary software application on the market capable of acknowledging text produced by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation methods for spotting generative AI content include digital watermarking, content authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have frequently produced incorrect positives, mistakenly implicating students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report info to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to divulge copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark produced images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, constraints on personal data collection, and a guideline that generative AI should “abide by socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have actually argued that such training is protected under reasonable use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair use training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can develop nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several lawsuits associated with making use of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, because they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has likewise begun taking public input to determine if these guidelines require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, businesses, and individuals, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to pause AI experiments, and actions by several governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has enormous potential for excellent and wicked at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge global advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, but that its destructive usage “might cause horrific levels of death and damage, extensive trauma, and deep mental damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers really should be done by them, given the difference in between computer systems and humans, and in between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “synthetic intelligence poses an existential danger to creative professions” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work concerns amongst underrepresented groups globally stays a vital facet. While AI promises effectiveness enhancements and ability acquisition, concerns about task displacement and biased recruiting processes continue amongst these groups, as detailed in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions include mitigating biases, promoting transparency, respecting personal privacy and consent, and welcoming diverse groups and ethical considerations. Strategies involve rerouting policy focus on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s capacity for personalized mentor to optimize benefits while minimizing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI models can reflect and amplify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying data. For instance, a language model might assume that medical professionals and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are common in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design prompted with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A variety of methods for mitigating bias have actually been attempted, such as modifying input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and change them with somebody else’s similarity utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually gathered prevalent attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake star pornographic videos, vengeance porn, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial scams, and hidden foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated responses from both industry and federal government to identify and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (dispersed journal technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to create questionable statements in the vocal design of celebs, public officials, and other well-known individuals have actually raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In response, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually specified that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software used to clone voices has actually been utilized on well-known artists’ voices to develop songs that mimic their voices, gaining both tremendous popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have actually also been utilized to create better quality or full-length versions of songs that have actually been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been used to create brand-new digital artist characters, with some of these receiving adequate attention to get record deals at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have also faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise producing artists which develop unrealistic or immoral interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to develop reasonable phony material has been exploited in many kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to produce disinformation and scams. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being completely realistic, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, possibly leading to uncritical acceptance of incorrect details. [159] Additionally, large language models and other kinds of text-generation AI have been used to create fake reviews of e-commerce websites to boost scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually produced big language designs concentrated on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, allowing enemies to get assistance with harmful demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety restrictions at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models needs an enormous quantity of computing power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have revealed concerns about the environmental impact that the advancement and implementation of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater used for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these effects might increase as these models are integrated into commonly utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs need to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring prospective ecological expenses prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to lower electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more efficient device finding out designs, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the number of times that designs require to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological effect of these designs, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these designs, [167] controling their energy and water usage, [168] motivating scientists to release information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject matter specialists who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: “inferior or unwanted A.I. material in social media, art, books and … in search results page.” [172] Journalists have revealed issues about the scale of low-quality produced content with respect to social networks material moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social networks companies to spread out such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover greater quality or preferred content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of web pages, were device translated. A number of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were translated throughout a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped updating the data for a number of reasons: high expenses for acquiring information from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has contaminated the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in a surge of AI-generated material throughout numerous domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of recently published computer system science papers and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, problems in the resulting designs may happen. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive destruction and ultimately leads to a “model collapse” after numerous models. [186] Tests have actually been performed with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As an effect, the value of information gathered from real human interactions with systems might end up being increasingly valuable in the presence of LLM-generated content in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is typically used as an alternative to information produced by real-world events. Such information can be released to verify mathematical models and to train maker learning models while maintaining user personal privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The method is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with former racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public looks given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding mishap. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “stealthily genuine”, and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amidst the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have published short articles whose material and/or byline have actually been verified or thought to be developed by generative AI models – typically with false content, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had used generative AI to produce posts for a lot of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced 10s of countless articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has traditionally been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce newspaper article” based on input data offered, such as “details of current events”. Some news who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that went into producing precise and artful news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay small publishers to compose 3 posts each day using a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the understanding or authorization of the websites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the published articles to be labeled as being developed or assisted by these models. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with short articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have expressed issue that generative AI might have a damaging effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for experimenting with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies creating a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which summarizes newspaper article, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly additional reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to prospective mistakes around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over declining audience trust, outlets all over the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published standards around how they plan to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “mainly human with some assistance from AI”. The outcomes of international surveys reported that people were more uneasy with news subjects including politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer shows website

Technology website

Artificial basic intelligence – Kind of AI with wide-ranging capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that simulates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language model
Large language design – Type of artificial intelligence model
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to generate music
Generative AI porn – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is produced algorithmically instead of by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of details retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in machine knowing

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, businesses, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, human beings win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted process planning: the state-of-the-art survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI organizer based on the HSTS preparation framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural element clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine knowing: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are without supervision multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form given that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early explores GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI model it says can go beyond GPT-4″. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI model – and a creative brand-new method to connect with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and threats of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that just English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “top quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer stimulates dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI“. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design construct times with new AI-driven part development method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is primary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software application … the new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in a few of the company’s most popular organization apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will become one of the most important functions for innovative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created in your area, so you don’t require an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model at home, you will require a computer build with an effective GPU that can manage the large quantity of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to halt sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to strict U.S. export requirements that limit just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software application to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be difficult. That’s a big problem for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI material for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first policy on artificial intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers choose harder AI rules as draft moves to last”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to apply only to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise embracing the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Starting”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people believe about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking computer game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art industry supposedly annihilated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring a contract that explicitly requires AI policies to protect authors and the works they create. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has end up being an important sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically referred to as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system positions an existential risk to creative professions, and all actors and performers are worthy of contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and talent made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries all over the world are stressed over AI being a risk to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are prejudiced. Can reasoning assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech might begin a global showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran use AI to boost anti-U.S. impact projects, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight against fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, state experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to produce celebrity hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record offer with AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ forecasts the biggest danger is that deepfakes will eventually become boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model all of a sudden attempts to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, junk … slop? The most current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs generate text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output surface everywhere,” she wrote. She offers the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dive,” in such a way that people do not, which has actually tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about ladies’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news websites is releasing AI-written articles under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured utilizing expert system to develop phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI function after incorrect news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are shocked to find their name and work have actually been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already getting into Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators alert AI could lead to ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the business’s utilizing it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.